From: Nigel Ballard (joejava_at_attbi.com)
Date: 2002-07-03 23:43:04 UTC
Cisco uses their own MAC but the rest is standard. Michael is right that
the 350 series took the output up to 100mW.
I just installed eight of the new dual-band Aironet 1200's, still 100mW, but I forgot to look for a chip ident.
Cheers Nigel
Nigel Ballard
Joejava Wireless Consultancy
nigel_at_joejava.com
www.joejava.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Codanti [mailto:michael_at_civis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:34 AM
To: carles_at_descom.es; hostap_at_lists.ssh.com
Subject: Re: CISCO Aironet 350.
> Are you sure that Aironet 350 is not based on the prims2 chipset ?
>
> I have readed that CISCO renamed the Aironet 4800B series to Cisco Aironet
340
> when it adquired the Aironet company and the Aironet 4800B series were
based
> on prism2 chipset.
> Cisco Aironet 350 is equivalent to the 340 series with a greater transmit
> power and then I believe that it mus be estill based on the prism2
chipset.
>>From what I understand Cisco/Aironet started with the Prism chipset (just
like Lucent) and modified it for themselves. My further understanding is
they actually use part of the Prism chips, but have their own MAC which
isn't Prism compatible.
No HostAP support for Cisco cards. :-(
Michael